Atsiliepimai
Aprašymas
Antti Laato examines Justin Martyr's interpretation of Isaiah in the Dialogue with Trypho. Isaiah functions as the backbone of Justin's argumentation, and four major themes derived from the book dominate his exegesis: (1) the new covenant established through the Messiah; (2) Jewish unbelief and divine punishment; (3) christological proof texts; and (4) the identity of Christians as the New Israel. Particular attention is given to the extent to which Justin's interpretation of Isaiah depends on earlier Christian and Jewish-Christian traditions, as well as to the ways in which his argumentation reflects earlier Jewish exegetical ideas.
Special attention is paid to Justin's composite quotations. The study demonstrates that he frequently inherited such quotations from earlier Christian tradition. In many cases, Justin intensified traditions that originally expressed more moderate attitudes, transforming them into polemical arguments directed against Jews. His exegesis also reveals substantial dependence on Jewish-Christian traditions concerning the Mosaic Torah, the Messiah, the earthly Jerusalem (which would be rebuilt), baptismal theology, the eschatological conversion of the Jews (which Justin significantly reinterpreted), and the promised Jewish remnant. Justin appropriated a range of Jewish exegetical interpretations of Isaiah that had originally functioned within intra-Jewish discourse and recast them within the context of anti-Jewish polemics.
Ironically, Justin's writings were preserved not because of the Jewish-Christian traditions they transmit, but because of their sharp criticism of Jews. By moving beyond Justin's polemical rhetoric, critical scholarship can recover valuable and often more positive Jewish-Christian traditions that lie behind his interpretation of Isaiah.
Antti Laato examines Justin Martyr's interpretation of Isaiah in the Dialogue with Trypho. Isaiah functions as the backbone of Justin's argumentation, and four major themes derived from the book dominate his exegesis: (1) the new covenant established through the Messiah; (2) Jewish unbelief and divine punishment; (3) christological proof texts; and (4) the identity of Christians as the New Israel. Particular attention is given to the extent to which Justin's interpretation of Isaiah depends on earlier Christian and Jewish-Christian traditions, as well as to the ways in which his argumentation reflects earlier Jewish exegetical ideas.
Special attention is paid to Justin's composite quotations. The study demonstrates that he frequently inherited such quotations from earlier Christian tradition. In many cases, Justin intensified traditions that originally expressed more moderate attitudes, transforming them into polemical arguments directed against Jews. His exegesis also reveals substantial dependence on Jewish-Christian traditions concerning the Mosaic Torah, the Messiah, the earthly Jerusalem (which would be rebuilt), baptismal theology, the eschatological conversion of the Jews (which Justin significantly reinterpreted), and the promised Jewish remnant. Justin appropriated a range of Jewish exegetical interpretations of Isaiah that had originally functioned within intra-Jewish discourse and recast them within the context of anti-Jewish polemics.
Ironically, Justin's writings were preserved not because of the Jewish-Christian traditions they transmit, but because of their sharp criticism of Jews. By moving beyond Justin's polemical rhetoric, critical scholarship can recover valuable and often more positive Jewish-Christian traditions that lie behind his interpretation of Isaiah.
Atsiliepimai